IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Forecast Errors and Farm Firm Growth

Listed author(s):
  • Kolajo, Ebenezer F.
  • Martin, Neil R., Jr.
  • Hanson, Gregory D.
Registered author(s):

    Researchers should be wary of the expectations framework and optimization method employed when drawing conclusions about the likely production behavior of farmers The article compares the predictive accuracy of two expectational schemes, supply-based expectations (SBE) and adaptive expectations (ADE), and two modeling approaches, multiperiod linear programming (MPLP) and recursive strategic linear programming (RSLP) Estimated costs of expectational error were sensitive to expectational assumptions and modeling methods Unanticipated annual revenue gains for the model farm ranged as high as $75,000 for the SBE scheme with the MPLP model, and shortfalls ranged as high as $52,000 for the ADE scheme with the RSLP model The magnitude of unanticipated gains and shortfalls increased disproportionately with greater use of debt financing

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service in its journal Journal of Agricultural Economics Research.

    Volume (Year): (1988)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:137560
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1400 Independence Ave.,SW, Mail Stop 1800, Washington, DC 20250-1800

    Phone: 202-694-5050
    Fax: 202-694-5700
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:137560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.