IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v12y1968i1p46-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note On Some Difficulties In Response Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jock R. Anderson

Abstract

Some empirical problems which tend to receive inadequate attention in response analysis are discussed. These include the variation not explained by fitted production functions, the sensitivity of optima and profits to price changes, the cost of developing production functions and the value in using them.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Jock R. Anderson, 1968. "A Note On Some Difficulties In Response Analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 46-53, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:12:y:1968:i:1:p:46-53
    DOI: j.1467-8489.1968.tb00566.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1968.tb00566.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-8489.1968.tb00566.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J.H. Duloy & George E. Battese, 1967. "Time And Recursiveness In Livestock Feeding Trials," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 184-191, December.
    2. Duloy, J.H. & Battese, George E., 1967. "Time And Recursiveness In Livestock Feeding Trials," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Joseph Havlicek & James A. Seagraves, 1962. "The "Cost of the Wrong Decision" as a Guide in Production Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 44(1), pages 157-168.
    4. Anderson, Jock R., 1967. "Economic Interpretation of Fertilizer Response Data," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(01), pages 1-15, March.
    5. J. R. Anderson & John L. Dillon, 1968. "Economic Considerations in Response Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 50(1), pages 130-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montgomery, John M. & Griffin, Ronald C. & Dahm, Fred P., 1986. "Comparing Random Profit From 'Optimal' Input Recommendations," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278077, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Jock R., 1971. "Guidelines for Applied Agricultural Research: Designing, Reporting and Interpreting Experiments," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(03), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Rafsnider, Giles T. & Skold, Melvin D. & Driscoll, Richard S., 1983. "Increases In Costs And Returns Due To Intensifying Range Forage Production Surveys: An Information Economic Analysis," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Kennedy, John O.S., 1986. "Rules For Optimal Fertilizer Carryover: An Alternative Explanation," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(02), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Colwell, J.D., 1973. "Assessments Of The Relative Values Of Compound Nitrogen-Phosphorus Fertilizers For Wheat Production," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 17(3), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Kolajo, Ebenezer F. & Martin, Neil R., Jr. & Hanson, Gregory D., 1988. "Forecast Errors and Farm Firm Growth," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 40(4), pages 1-10.
    6. Jha, A. K. & Pal, Suresh & Joshi, P. K., 2004. "Efficiency of Public-Funded Crop Sciences Research in India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 17(Conferenc), October.
    7. Montgomery, John M. & Griffin, Ronald C. & Dahm, Fred P., 1986. "Comparing Random Profit From 'Optimal' Input Recommendations," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278077, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Mkondiwa, Maxwell Gibson, 2015. "Whither Broad or Spatially Specific Fertilizer Recommendations?," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 237344, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Rausser, Gordon C. & Just, Richard E. & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Prospects and limitations of operations research applications in agriculture and agricultural policy," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt96c9m77v, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    10. Byerlee, Derek R. & Anderson, Jock R., 1969. "Value Of Predictors Of Uncontrolled Factors In Response Functions," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Zhou, Xia “Vivian” & Clark, Christopher D. & Lambert, Dayton M. & English, Burton C. & Larson, James A. & Boyer, Christopher N., 2015. "Biomass supply and nutrient runoff abatement under alternative biofuel feedstock production subsidies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 250-259.
    12. Yassour, Joseph & Zilberman, David D & Rausser, Gordon C., 1980. "Option choices among alternative technologies with stochastic yield," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt8xq1b77m, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    13. Joseph Yassour & David Zilberman & Gordon C. Rausser, 1981. "Optimal Choices among Alternative Technologies with Stochastic Yield," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 718-723.
    14. Swinton, Scott M., 2002. "Capturing household-level spatial influence in agricultural management using random effects regression," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 371-381, November.
    15. Lewis, C.D. & Malcolm, Bill & Jacobs, J.L. & Spangenberg, G. & Smith, K.F., 2013. "A method to estimate the potential net benefits of trait improvements in pasture species: Transgenic white clover for livestock grazing systems," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-16.
    16. Hall, Harry H., 1998. "Choosing an Empirical Production Function: Theory, Nonnested Hypotheses, Costs of Specifications," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 31977, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Godden, David P. & Helyar, K.R., 1980. "An Alternative Method for Deriving Optimal Fertilizer Rates," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(02), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Byerlee, Derek & Heisey, Paul, 1987. "On the Economics of Adaptive Research in Developing Country Agriculture," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270133, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:12:y:1968:i:1:p:46-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.