IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/stagec/135767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting the competitiveness of agricultural production in Hungary through an innovation system

Author

Listed:
  • Fenyvesi, Laszlo
  • Erdeine Kesmarki-Gally, Szilvia

Abstract

The final versions of the European Union’s (EU) support schemes and funding instruments the 2014-2020 budgeting period have not yet been prepared. What is final, though, is that the ten-year Lisbon Strategy which aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of the EU ended in 2010. In addition to three priorities (smart, sustainable and inclusive growth), the recently launched Europe 2020 Strategy has set five headline targets to be reached, one of them being an increased investment in research and development. This is evidently a difficult challenge owing to the limited economic capacity of individual EU Member States. A considerable share of agricultural production activities are performed by small- and medium-sized enterprises and farmers who face difficulty in reaching the level of concentration need to gain market advantage. Consequently, it is imperative to establish a system that can maintain close connections with producers and improve innovation activities. Without such a system, a significant growth of added value cannot be foreseen in Hungarian agriculture. This paper describes a technology development system that incorporates three elements (measurement of inputs in space and time, market-focused technology development and a self-teaching information system for farmers) and that could be used in rural development, primarily in the area of agricultural production. While developing the system, we relied on experience gained from the operation of previous agricultural production systems and also considered the specific local conditions with the aim of offering a potential solution to meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenyvesi, Laszlo & Erdeine Kesmarki-Gally, Szilvia, 2012. "Boosting the competitiveness of agricultural production in Hungary through an innovation system," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-5, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:135767
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.135767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/135767/files/08-Gally.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.135767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. W. Kok & Bas Hillebrand & Wim G. Biemans, 2003. "What Makes Product Development Market Oriented? Towards a Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 137-162.
    2. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    3. Husti, Istvan, 2009. "General problems related to innovation and its potential in the Hungarian agro-food sector," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 109, pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erdeiné Késmárki-Gally, Szilvia & Fenyvesi, László, 2014. "A new „agricultural electronic marketplace”, the way forward for the procurement of inputs," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182953, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Jelena Birovljev & Biljana Ćetković & Goran Vukmirović, 2013. "Prospects Of Improving The Competitiveness Of Serbian Agriculture In (Re)Industrialization Process," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 364-372, September.
    3. Takács-György, Katalin & Toyserkani, Ahmad M.P., 2014. "Imitation Vs. Innovation In The Sme Sector," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2014(2).
    4. Venelin Terziev & Ekaterina Arabska, 2015. "Opportunities of networking in Bulgarian agrifood sector," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604488, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    5. Enikő Lencsés & István Takács & Katalin Takács-György, 2014. "Farmers’ Perception of Precision Farming Technology among Hungarian Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Késmárki-Gally, Szilvia Erdeiné, 2014. "The Market-Oriented Production System As A Part Of Agricultural Innovation," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2014(6).
    7. Takacs-Gyorgy, Katalin & Lencses, Eniko & Takacs, Istvan, 2013. "Economic benefits of precision weed control and why its uptake is so slow," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(1), pages 1-7, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takacs-Gyorgy, Katalin & Lencses, Eniko & Takacs, Istvan, 2013. "Economic benefits of precision weed control and why its uptake is so slow," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(1), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2014. "Has Medical Innovation Reduced Cancer Mortality?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 60(1), pages 135-177.
    3. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    4. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    5. Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel Karakara & Evans Osabuohien, 2020. "ICT adoption, competition and innovation of informal firms in West Africa: a comparative study of Ghana and Nigeria," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 397-414, June.
    6. Bharat Diwakar & Gilad Sorek, 2016. "Dynamics of Human Capital Accumulation, IPR Policy, and Growth," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2016-11, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    7. Dana Benešová & Miroslav Hušek, 2019. "Factors for efficient use of information and communication technologies influencing sustainable position of service enterprises in Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1182-1194, March.
    8. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    9. ManYing Kang & Marcel Ausloos, 2017. "An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Xuebing Tang, 2012. "The Assessment on Environmental Value of Thermal Power in China," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 115-120, March.
    11. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    12. Galasso, Alberto & Schankerman, Mark, 2013. "Patents and Cumulative Innovation:Causal Evidence from the Courts," IIR Working Paper 13-16, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Jos� Lobo & Charlotta Mellander & Kevin Stolarick & Deborah Strumsky, 2014. "The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 155-177, February.
    14. Laura Barbieri & Daniela Bragoli & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2015. "Public Support to Innovation Strategies," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1509, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    15. Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius Narjoko & Heiwai Tang & Yifan Zhang & Tomohiko Inui & Keiko Ito & Keishi Shoji & Nguyen Dinh Chuc & Nguyen Ngoc Anh & Li Hai Anh & Nguyen Thi Phuong Mai & Sadayuki Takii & Di, 2011. "Dynamics of Firm Selection Process in Globalized Economies," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2011-RPR-03 edited by Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius Narjoko, July.
    16. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    17. Olusola O. Ololade & Palesa P. Rametse, 2018. "Determining factors that enable managers to implement an environmental management system for sustainable construction: A case study in Johannesburg," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1720-1732, December.
    18. Leonard F.S. Wang & Arijit Mukherjee, 2014. "Patent Protection, Innovation and Technology Licensing," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3-4), pages 245-254, December.
    19. Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2016. "Screening for Patent Quality," CEPR Discussion Papers 11688, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Federico Biagi & Daniele Bondonio & Alberto Martini, 2015. "Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Programmes. Evidence from a Decade of Subsidies to Italian Firm," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1619, European Regional Science Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:135767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akiiihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.