IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/saeasj/205590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Potato Trade Liberalisation on Soil Erosion: A Multi Period Market Simulation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Weerahewa, J.
  • Gunatilake, H.M

Abstract

This study quantifies the welfare changes in potato trade liberalisation in Sri Lanka incorporating long-term social cost of soil erosion into a multi-period market simulation model. Seven alternative crops were considered for studying long-term land use changes induced by potato trade liberalisation. On-site cost of soil erosion was incorporated in the model through a dynamic soil depth crop yield function and cumulative off-site costs were deducted in calculating net welfare changes associated with land use changes induced by potato trade liberalisation. The results show that gain in consumer surplus is much higher than loss in producer surplus, government revenue and environmental cost. Thus, findings show that trade liberalisation is welfare improving. With regard to the impact of trade liberalisation on environment, the findings are however, non-conclusive. Depending on the empirical setting, trade liberalisation may induce environmentally friendly or unfriendly land use changes. Some environmental policies may be necessary in conjunction with trade liberalisation as it may not necessarily induce environmentally friendly land use changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Weerahewa, J. & Gunatilake, H.M, 2000. "Impact of Potato Trade Liberalisation on Soil Erosion: A Multi Period Market Simulation Model," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 3, pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeasj:205590
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.205590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205590/files/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.205590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeasj:205590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/slaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.