Author
Listed:
- Satria, Putra Utama
- Ketut, Sukiyono
Abstract
Limited field agricultural extension services hinder productivity. Farmers struggle to achieve optimal yields without sufficient technical support, threatening national food security. This study aimed to develop a model for evaluating the effectiveness of farmer groups in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. This study involved a population of 220 individuals from eight farmer groups located in the South Seluma Sub-district, Seluma Regency. A survey was conducted with 142 members of farmer groups in Seluma District, selected using simple random sampling. The validity test used had two parts: factor validity and discriminant validity. Structural Equation Model (SEM) was applied to the collected data to develop models that identified the relationships among factors related to agricultural extension performance, farmer contact resources, and the effectiveness of farmer groups. The results indicate that the effectiveness of farmer groups was positively related to the farmer contact resources. However, this was negatively influenced by the performance of agricultural extension services, which faced issues such as limited access, low managerial competency, and fewer business opportunities. The model showed that farmers in the study area were more open to Farmer Contact Resources than to Field Agricultural Extension. Furthermore, enhancing the quality of human capital in agricultural extension services is essential to improving the effectiveness of farmer groups. This can be accomplished by enhancing managerial skills, providing market-oriented training for agricultural extension, and increasing the ratio of agricultural extension to farmers.
Suggested Citation
Satria, Putra Utama & Ketut, Sukiyono, 2025.
"Effectiveness of Farmer Groups: Roles of Farmer Contact Resources and Field Agriculture Extension in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia,"
Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 6(3), July.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:reowae:412766
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.412766
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:412766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.