Author
Listed:
- Meng, Fan
- Chokeanand, Bussracumpakorn
Abstract
Amid accelerating climate change and the global shift toward sustainable consumption, agricultural by-products have gained attention as low-carbon alternatives to conventional plastic packaging. This study explores the psychological and behavioral mechanisms underlying consumer acceptance of sugarcane bagasse containers, aiming to advance understanding of how agricultural residue-based innovations drive sustainable packaging adoption. An integrated framework (EPIM-LCP) is developed by synthesizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Environmental Behavior Theory (EBT). Based on empirical data from 450 respondents in Guangxi, China, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to test eleven hypotheses. Results reveal that environmental concern and environmental values significantly enhance low-carbon awareness, which positively shapes consumer attitudes. Perceived usefulness and ease of use influence attitudes, mediating their impact on acceptance intention. Attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control all significantly predict adoption intention, with attitude being the most influential factor. Two key mediation pathways are identified: (1) environmental cognition → low-carbon awareness → attitude → intention; and (2) technical perception → attitude → intention. The model exhibits strong predictive validity through PLS-Predict analysis. This research contributes to sustainable packaging literature by being one of the first to integrate TAM, TPB, and EBT for agricultural by-products adoption. The findings offer theoretical insights into consumer psychology while providing practical implications for designers, marketers, and policymakers promoting bio-based packaging solutions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:412762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.