Author
Abstract
The Philippine bamboo industry represents a significant economic and environmental sector, characterized by its versatility, rapid growth, and rising global demand. This research aims to define the bamboo industry in Central Luzon and evaluate the business models of 36 registered bamboo enterprises under the Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) Bamboo Industry Cluster, utilising the Business Model Canvas (BMC) framework. A descriptive quantitative design was utilized, employing total population sampling and a structured questionnaire validated by domain experts. The findings indicate that the majority of enterprises operate on a micro-scale, depending on self-financing, backyard sourcing, and manual production techniques. Desirability is rooted in specific customer segments and value propositions that emphasize environmental sustainability and artistic expression. Feasibility is enhanced by informal networks, referrals, and cooperative partnerships; however, it is limited by restricted capital, automation challenges, and a consistent supply of bamboo. Viability is achieved through lean operations and income diversification, with numerous enterprises reporting modest profits and alternative revenue streams from farming, non-bamboo products, and machinery rentals. The results underscore the need to enhance innovation capacity, institutional support, market access, and value chain integration. Recommendations include strengthening procurement policies, semi-mechanization, IP protection, and shared service facilities. The study offers a strategic analysis of the potential for local bamboo enterprises to achieve sustainability, competitiveness, and social inclusivity as catalysts for rural development and ecological resilience.
Suggested Citation
Edgelly, G. Vitug, 2025.
"Understanding Agribusiness Models in the Bamboo Sector: A Case From Central Luzon, Philippines,"
Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 6(3), July.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:reowae:410381
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410381
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:410381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.