Author
Listed:
- Gemma, Chiaffarelli
- Ilda, Vagge
Abstract
Climate change trends and the ongoing environmental crisis are anticipated to significantly affect crop production, particularly rice, which is highly sensitive to these changes. This study explores adaptive strategies for ensuring long-term food security through agri-environmental farm management practices, focusing on a polyculture rice production model (POLY), which emphasizes crop diversification, land races, resource management, and environmental stewardship. We compare the POLY model with local organic (ORG) and conventional (CV) models in northern Italy's western Po Plain, particularly during the extreme climatic event of 2022 and the preceding five years. Although POLY and ORG farms exhibited lower average rice yields (3.9 and 4.3 Mg/ha, respectively) compared to CV (6.7 Mg/ha), they demonstrated better resilience to the 2022 climate anomaly. POLY farms achieved yield increases of 21-22% for the top performers, while ORG farms saw a 20% increase, contrasting with a 10% decrease in CV yields. Yield variability was higher in POLY and ORG farms due to cultivar diversity, providing insurance against climatic unpredictability. Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between total annual precipitation and CV yields, whereas POLY and ORG yields showed less sensitivity to climate fluctuations. Economically, POLY farms outperformed in efficiency, indicating a viable model for addressing agri-environmental challenges without necessarily increasing land productivity. This study highlights the importance of integrating such models into comprehensive strategies to mitigate the interconnected crises of environment, climate, and food supply.
Suggested Citation
Gemma, Chiaffarelli & Ilda, Vagge, 2025.
"Performance of Agroforestry versus Conventional Rice Farms under a Changing Climate: Evidence from Western Po Plain,"
Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 6(2), April.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:reowae:410338
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410338
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:410338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.