Author
Listed:
- Afrianingsih, Putri
- Rahmat, Syahni
- Hasnah
- Alfan, Miko
Abstract
This study aims to identify the factors underlying the innovative behavior of coffee farmers in implementing Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The main variables studied are attitudes, subjective norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control, followed by local characteristics and innovation of variables as additional variables of the TPB concept. Data were analyzed quantitatively with primary data through distributing questionnaires to 120 Arabica coffee farmers in Solok Regency. The PLS-SEM method was used to analyze statistical data. The study found that innovation characteristics directly affect attitudes and knowledge, while local characteristics only affect attitudes. Perceived Behavioral Control affects farmers' innovative intentions and behavior. Innovation characteristics indirectly affect innovative behavior in implementing GAP through knowledge and intentions, while farmer knowledge indirectly affects innovative behavior through farmers' intentions in implementing GAP. This study offers further insight into how innovation characteristics, local context, and perceived behavioral control significantly shape coffee farmers' attitudes, intentions, and innovative behavior in adopting Good Agriculture Practices (GAP). By accommodating more factors that affect intentions and behavior, adding new variables can improve the accuracy of the predictive model. This allows us to predict better how farmers will respond and adopt good agricultural practices. The results of this study can provide valuable information for policymakers and businesses to develop more effective strategies to encourage farmers to implement GAP.
Suggested Citation
Afrianingsih, Putri & Rahmat, Syahni & Hasnah & Alfan, Miko, 2025.
"Exploring the Factors Driving Coffee Farmers' Innovative Behavior in GAP Implementation: A TPB Approach,"
Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 6(2), March.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:reowae:410321
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410321
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:410321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.