IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362857.html

Participatory breeding in organic systems: Experiences from maize case studies in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Mujjabi, Christopher
  • Bohn, Martin
  • Wander, Michelle
  • Ugarte, Carmen

Abstract

Participatory breeding and crop selection can satis­fy the needs of underserved groups of farmers (e.g., organic producers, farmers producing spe­cialty grain for niche markets) neglected by the modern global seed industry. Participatory research methods that value local knowledge and facilitate the active involvement of producers, researchers, and other actors involved in the agri-food system are tactics that can help us achieve sustainable agri­culture. Interest in the use of participatory methods to increase the value of U.S. land-grant universities to society has grown rapidly during the last decade. Interest includes re-engagement in the develop­ment of maize hybrids that perform well in a diverse range of heterogeneous growing environ­ments and that are better suited for sustainability-minded producers, buyers, and consumers. Sys­tems-based breeding aimed at protecting the envi­ronment and providing food, fiber, and energy while considering equity issues, has been proposed as a way to overcome the shortcomings of privat­ized approaches. In this article, we consider recent projects that use collaborative methods for hybrid maize breeding, cultivar testing, and genetic research to develop, identify, and deliver traits associated with crop performance, quality, and sus­tainability. Three case studies consider the efforts focused on developing non-GMO varieties for organic and specialty markets. We find that, unlike many successful efforts focused on the improve­ment of other crops, there are few promising mod­els for participatory breeding of hybrid maize. Even though many projects have sought to involve stakeholders with a variety of methods, all have struggled to meaningfully engage farmers in maize hybrid improvement. Still, our reflection of case studies calls for systems-based breeding and sug­gests a path forward. This route would seek to address the needs, perspectives, and values of a broader range of actors participating in the food system by leveraging technologies and infrastruc­ture in service of the public. Land-grant universities are well positioned to play a crucial role in coordi­nating efforts, facilitating partnerships, and sup­porting breeding programs that satisfy societal wants that include health, equity, and care.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujjabi, Christopher & Bohn, Martin & Wander, Michelle & Ugarte, Carmen, 2024. "Participatory breeding in organic systems: Experiences from maize case studies in the United States," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 13(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362857/files/1193.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.