IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362845.html

Northeastern bakers' views on organic and regeneratively certified flours

Author

Listed:
  • Simons, Karen

Abstract

There is a continued interest in reviving small and midsize grain mills that allow for more differenti­ated flour offerings, including mills with environ­mental benefits. This study seeks to assess North­eastern bakers’ and distributors’ views on U.S. Department of Agriculture–certified organic flour and potential demand for flour with the Regenera­tive Organic certification by conducting a survey of bakers and distributors. Results provide evidence that, for multiple reasons, many bakers use both conventional and certified organic flours despite the fact that they cannot call the final product organic and, if budgets allowed, would increase organic flour purchases. Bakers and distributors believe customers do not understand the impor­tance of the organic certification, that customers need to be educated on the Regenerative Organic Certified label, and that bakers would switch to flour with a Regenerative Organic certification if quality and price were comparable to organic.

Suggested Citation

  • Simons, Karen, 2023. "Northeastern bakers' views on organic and regeneratively certified flours," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 13(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362845/files/1177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.