Author
Abstract
In local food systems research, a notable gap exists in exploring the personal motivations of individual gardeners, with most studies focusing solely on the overarching objectives of community gardens in Global South regions. This study bridges the gap by investigating the multifaceted motivations driving urban gardening among low-income residents in Cape Town’s Cape Flats, using a mixed-methods approach that integrates survey data from 97 participants and semi-structured interviews conducted across 34 community gardens. Although community gardens are predominantly designed with economic aims as evidenced by 29 out of 34 gardens prioritizing income generation, the findings reveal a tension between these institutional objectives and the personal motivations of individual gardeners. Quantitative analysis of the responses indicates that while 76.3% of participants indicated economic reasons, all respondents affirmed the importance of social, health, and environmental benefits. Qualitative insights further reveal that many gardeners perceive their participation as a means to enhance physical and psychological well‐being and to promote sustainable environmental practices, despite facing structural barriers such as limited space, time constraints, and inadequate resources. This study contributes to urban food systems literature by challenging conventional economic framings of urban gardening in the Global South and advocating for inclusive policies that bridge the gap between institutional aims and individual experiences, thereby enhancing the resilience and sustainability of urban community gardens.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.