IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/359939.html

Farmers' Perspectives on the Adoption and Impacts of Nutrition Incentive and Farm to School Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Lehnerd, Megan E.
  • Sacheck, Jennifer M.
  • Griffin, Timothy S.
  • Goldberg, Jeanne P.
  • Cash, Sean B.

Abstract

Recent increases in consumer demand for local food have resulted in more opportunities for food to be purchased in close proximity to where it is produced. However, local markets can be challeng­ing retail outlets for farmers and not uniformly affordable and accessible to all consumers. Farmers market nutrition incentive (FMNI) and farm to school (F2S) programs are two community-based initiatives that support farmers while simultane­ously lessening the burden of local food access for lower income populations. In this study, we explore farmer perceptions, barriers to adoption, and impacts of FMNI and F2S programs. A survey was developed based on the Diffusion of Innova­tions theory to assess (1) the key factors that influ­ence adoption of FMNI and F2S programs; (2) farmer perceptions of the most significant barriers to program adoption; and (3) the influence of non-economic impacts on farmers’ motivation to participate in those programs. A total of 155 Mid-Atlantic fruit and vegetable farmers completed the survey. Participating farmers perceived FMNI and F2S as providing advantageous social impact and various economic opportunities. However, partici­pants and non-participants had differing perspec­tives on program complexity, compatibility with their business model, and the degree to which others have succeeded when participating. The most significant barriers relate to issues with prod­uct pricing, customer engagement, and logistics. Three-quarters of farmers ranked social/commu­nity impacts as most important to them. A deeper understanding of farmers’ involvement in FMNI and F2S programs will help address barriers and modify program components to increase econom­ic, social/community, and environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehnerd, Megan E. & Sacheck, Jennifer M. & Griffin, Timothy S. & Goldberg, Jeanne P. & Cash, Sean B., 2018. "Farmers' Perspectives on the Adoption and Impacts of Nutrition Incentive and Farm to School Programs," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 8(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/359939/files/550.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.