IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/8553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Market-Window Analysis for Crown-Cut Broccoli Produced in Southwest Virginia

Author

Listed:
  • Dillard, John
  • Kmak, Heather
  • Russ, M.J.
  • Coale, Charles W., Jr.
  • Bratsch, Tony
  • Reaves, Dixie Watts

Abstract

This research determines the profitability for farmers of marketing film-wrapped Crown-Cut broccoli in Southwest Virginia. Historical price data was collected in three eastern terminal markets (Atlanta, Baltimore, and Philadelphia) for Crown-Cut and bunched broccoli from October 1998 to January 2005. Cost-of-production budgets were estimated for Crown-Cut broccoli. The economic data was entered into a market window analysis and the profitability of each market was evaluated. The profitability of Crown-Cut broccoli was illustrated by market-window graphics. Market windows were generated using an analysis platform developed by Kalo (1998). The profitability estimates were calculated by posting historical market prices by week in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subtracting corresponding unit costs for transportation and production. Study results show that there is potential profit for producing Crown-Cut broccoli during the first weeks of October. Atlanta proved to have the most profit potential of the three markets studied. Given the frost dates in the area, these production windows favor broccoli production without weather risk. Southwestern Virginia should consider developing Crown-Cut production options: the early open market windows combined with the potential for reducing production costs by double-cropping means that a potential profit opportunity exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Dillard, John & Kmak, Heather & Russ, M.J. & Coale, Charles W., Jr. & Bratsch, Tony & Reaves, Dixie Watts, 2006. "A Market-Window Analysis for Crown-Cut Broccoli Produced in Southwest Virginia," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:8553
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.8553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/8553/files/37010052.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.8553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:8553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.