IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/55602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Econometric Evaluation of Producers’ Preferences for Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Modified Food Products

Author

Listed:
  • Chembezi, Duncan M.
  • Chaverest, E'licia L.
  • Wheelock, Gerald
  • Sharma, Govind C.
  • Kebede, Ellene
  • Tegegne, Fisseha

Abstract

This study uses multivariate statistical procedures to assess producers’ preferences for mandatory labeling of genetically modified (GM) products. The analysis is based on a sample of 1,887 farm producers in ten Southern states of the U.S. who claimed to be “somewhat knowledgeable†about biotechnology. A logistic regression model was employed to isolate characteristics of producers assumed to influence their perceptions of biotechnology and preferences for mandatory labeling. The study highlights a number of important findings with significant implications. It reveals that most producers in the ten states are older (average age is 58 years) and have some college education but remain part-time farmers, dependent largely on off-farm income for their livelihood. The majority raise beef cattle or produce hay and timber. Most producers are in favor of mandatory labeling even though only half of the respondents totally agree with it. They believe biotech will benefit larger farmers, and that farmers will be dependent on large corporations that develop and market biotechnology inputs. The majority are neutral about whether consumers will accept biotech crop products. They also remain undecided about government’s ability to properly regulate agricultural biotechnology. Limitations and benefits of biotechnology, education, and enterprise characteristics significantly influence producers’ probability of being in favor of mandatory labeling. Information sources such newspaper, radio, and television; race; age; and whether a county was underserved do not significantly affect producers’ perceptions regarding mandatory labeling of GM food products.

Suggested Citation

  • Chembezi, Duncan M. & Chaverest, E'licia L. & Wheelock, Gerald & Sharma, Govind C. & Kebede, Ellene & Tegegne, Fisseha, 2008. "An Econometric Evaluation of Producers’ Preferences for Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Modified Food Products," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 39(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:55602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/55602
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turvey, Calum G. & Mafoua, Edouard & Schilling, Brian J. & Onyango, Benjamin M., 2003. "Economics, Hysteresis And Agroterrorism," Working Papers 18186, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    2. Patrick Lenain & Marcos Bonturi & Vincent Koen, 2002. "The Economic Consequences of Terrorism," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 334, OECD Publishing.
    3. Sandler, Todd & Enders, Walter, 2004. "An economic perspective on transnational terrorism," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 301-316, June.
    4. Volker Nitsch & Dieter Schumacher, 2003. "Terrorism and Trade," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 353, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Frenzen, Paul D. & Buzby, Jean C. & Rasco, Barbara, 2001. "Product Liability And Microbial Foodborne Illness," Agricultural Economics Reports 34059, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Gary S. Becker & Yona Rubinstein, 2011. "Fear and the Response to Terrorism: An Economic Analysis," CEP Discussion Papers dp1079, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Jérôme Adda, 2007. "Behavior towards health risks: An empirical study using the “Mad Cow” crisis as an experiment," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 285-305, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:55602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.