IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/158972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Choices for Organic and Local Food Products in North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y.
  • Robbins, Richard D.
  • Johnson, Daniel

Abstract

Consumer preferences for local and organic food in North Carolina have been steadily growing over the past decade. In order to measure the attitudes and preferences associated with the decision to select organic over local or vice versa, we first use qualitative methods to gain more knowledge in potential factors that affect consumers who patronize farmers’ markets, the most utilized sales outlet by North Carolina organic and local farmers. We begin this process through the use of focus groups. These focus groups are selected from five locations throughout the state from three regions – Coastal (Wilmington), Piedmont (Charlotte, Greensboro, and Raleigh), and Mountain (Asheville). Therefore, the objective of the study is to evaluate the perceptions of consumers’ choices for organic and locally grown available at farmers market produce. This update focuses primarily on the Piedmont Triad region, which is located in the Northcentral region of the state including three major cities, which include Greensboro, High Point and Winston-Salem. The availability of locally and organically produced foods includes several regional supermarkets, specialty grocery stores, consumer cooperatives, farmers markets, and community supported agriculture initiatives. Ten to twelve target participants for the focus groups are representative of consumers of organic food products as indicated by the Organic Trade Association - 74 percent Caucasian, 13 percent African American, eight percent Hispanic, 2.7 percent Asian and other make up 1.6 percent of all organic consumers.Preliminary findings revealed that the only distinction consumers make between locally produced and organically produced foods is labeling. Participants did provide their definition of “local,” which included “within the county, state or couple of hundred mile radius.” However, participants had limited knowledge regarding organic certification. Although the majority of participants purchase more local foods versus organic foods, they were willing to pay as much as 100% more for organic food with some participants “willing to find ways to make it affordable.” Although farmers markets, consumer cooperatives, and community supported agriculture provided outlets for purchasing locally and organically produced foods. Participants also made purchases at available regional and specialty grocery stores. The primary implications of the preliminary findings in the Piedmont Triad region of North Carolina are as follow: (1) consumers appear indifferent to locally produced foods and organically produced foods and (2) consumers are “willing to pay” for food products that are perceived to have healthy, affordable, quality (taste/color) and local economy attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y. & Robbins, Richard D. & Johnson, Daniel, 2013. "Consumer Choices for Organic and Local Food Products in North Carolina," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 44(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:158972
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.158972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158972/files/NorCalOrganic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.158972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:158972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.