IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Market Potential for Local Organic Produce in the South Atlantic Sub-Region

Listed author(s):
  • Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y.
  • Robbins, Richard D.
  • Smallwood, Arneisha
Registered author(s):

    The overall purpose of this study is to conduct exploratory research on the market potential for local organic sales outlets for small-to-medium scale farmers in the South Atlantic Sub-region of the U.S. The objectives are as follow: (1) identification of the leading organic produce in each state of the South Atlantic, (2) identification of supermarket chains offering the leading organic produce of the South Atlantic, (3) identification of the leading produce with the highest premium potential in the South Atlantic, and (4) identification of local organic supply chain linkages for the leading organic produce in the South Atlantic. Initially, this study proposed to identify established supply chains of leading organic produce within the state of North Carolina. However, the state ranked only 16th in the U.S. in the number of certified/exempt farms, with only 171 farms receiving 100 percent of the total value of sales from organic production. With limited impact to North Carolina’s economy or agribusiness industry, we expanded the study to include states within the entire South Atlantic sub-region of the U.S. – Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. We used the 2007 Census of Agriculture, 2008 Organic Production Survey and Perishables Group FreshFacts® data from August of 2009 to 2010, and the 2006 National Farmers Market Manager Survey to identify patterns. Conventional and certified production, retail sales, and organic retail premiums are identified and evaluated to gain more insight of established supply chains. The data shows potential for small scale producers with $5,000 or less by value of sales to market their goods as ‘organic’ due to exemption from the certification process at consumer direct sales outlets. However, small-to-medium farms (value of sales greater than $5,000 but less than $250,000) with USDA ‘certification’ labels may have greater opportunities to establish contracts with wholesalers as well as market their produce in multiple sales outlets. Directions for further research will include 1) evaluating market power of the contracting agent in the market for certified organic produce and 2) assessing the benefits and costs to producers and sales outlets for ‘organic’ produce.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Food Distribution Research Society in its journal Journal of Food Distribution Research.

    Volume (Year): 43 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139453
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.