IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

College Students' Opinions of U.S. Farm-Raised Catfish

Listed author(s):
  • Hanson, Terrill R.
  • Rose, Patrick
Registered author(s):

    A survey focusing on factors related to consumption of fish and seafood, including catfish, and targeted at college-aged students was developed and administered in conjunction with Auburn University's Earth Day dining promotion. Six hundred forty completed surveys were obtained over two days in April, 2012. Findings suggest that students had an overall positive opinion toward catfish, citing enjoyment of flavor (44 percent), better texture (38 percent), less expensive (43 percent), and greater availability in the area (52 percent) than other seafood choices as reasons to consume catfish. Twenty-seven percent of respondents consumed catfish at least once a month. Student non-consumers indicated a dislike of taste, texture, and/or smell (54 percent) as their reason for non-consumption. Factors that would increase catfish consumption included having local Alabama farm-raised catfish products available (48 percent), lower price (56 percent), and if they thought catfish had greater nutritional value compared to other fish products (40 percent. Students also believe that they would be more likely to consume catfish products that are locally grown (34 percent) and farm-raised (28 percent). When students eat catfish, 23 percent "always" or "frequently" cook it at home or enjoy it at a sit-down restaurant (23 percent). Sixty-nine percent of students preferred carfish fried, 46 percent preferred it grilled, and 18 percent preferred it baked. Environmental and sustainability concerns were important to 21 percent, who would increase consumption because catfish are grown in ecofriendly ways. Overall results suggest development of consumer -oriented products that address young adults' preferences for locally grown, environmentally friendly, easy-to-access, and easy to prepare catfish dishes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Food Distribution Research Society in its journal Journal of Food Distribution Research.

    Volume (Year): 42 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139297
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.