IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jasfmr/233873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability of Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet Production in Whole Farm Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Brian
  • Ritten, John
  • Bastian, Christopher
  • Kniss, Andrew

Abstract

A Linear Programming model coupled with Monte Carlo simulation compares the profitability of glyphosate-resistant (GR) and conventional sugarbeet systems for a case farm in Southeast Wyoming. The optimal combination of cropping mixtures maximizing total farm profitability is determined based on varying crop and input prices as well as rotational constraints impacting the potential acres of GR sugarbeet. If restrictions on GR sugarbeet occur, producers are better off to grow at least some conventional sugarbeet in their rotation. Profitability reductions would likely not be as great as partial budget analyses might indicate if no sugarbeet were available, although much more variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Brian & Ritten, John & Bastian, Christopher & Kniss, Andrew, 2015. "Profitability of Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet Production in Whole Farm Systems," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2015, pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:233873
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.233873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/233873/files/428_Lee_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.233873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni & Jones Ritten, Chian & Shogren, Jason F. & Ehmke, Mariah D. & Bastian, Christopher T. & Parkhurst, Gregory M., 2019. "Adding realism to the Agglomeration Bonus: How endogenous land returns affect habitat fragmentation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:233873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asfmrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.