IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/199775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal Welfare: eine empirische Analyse landwirtschaftlicher Frames

Author

Listed:
  • Deimel, Ingke
  • Franz, Annabell
  • Spiller, Achim

Abstract

Nach den aktuellen Erkenntnissen der nutztierwissenschaftlichen Forschung rekurriert das Verständnis von Animal Welfare auf vier Kriterien: Haltungssystem, Management, Tiergesundheit und Tierverhalten (KEELING und KJÆRNES, 2009). Es ist jedoch unklar, inwieweit sich dieses Verständnis auch in der landwirtschaftlichen Praxis wiederfindet. In der vorliegenden empirischen Studie wird erstmals mit Hilfe einer Faktorenanalyse das Animal-Welfare-Verständnis konventioneller deutscher Schweinemäster untersucht. Hierzu wird auf das theoretische Konzept des Framing zurückgegriffen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass bei den Befragten zwei Frames von Animal Welfare existieren : Während Kriterien des (natürlichen) Tierverhaltens im Verständnis der befragten Landwirte eine untergeordnete Rolle spielen, findet eine biologisch-technische Definition von Animal Welfare deutliche Zustimmung. According to the current state of livestock sciences the assessment of animal welfare nowadays is based on four dimensions, i. e. good housing, good feeding, good health and appropriate behaviour (KEELING and KJÆRNES, 2009). However, it remains unclear to what extent this understanding of animal welfare is shared by farmers. The aim of the present study is thus to estimate the concerns of conventional German pig farmers about animal welfare by means of a factor analysis. For this purpose the theoretical concept of framing is applied. The results show that two animal welfare frames exist among respondents. While an animal welfare understanding that focuses on biological and technical aspects is highly approved, criteria based on (natural) animal behaviour play only a minor role.

Suggested Citation

  • Deimel, Ingke & Franz, Annabell & Spiller, Achim, 2012. "Animal Welfare: eine empirische Analyse landwirtschaftlicher Frames," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(02), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:199775
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.199775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/199775/files/GJAE_4_Franz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.199775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schulze, Birgit & Deimel, Ingke, 2012. "Conflicts between agriculture and society: the role of lobby groups in the animal welfare discussion and their impact on meat consumption," 22nd International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA) World Forum, 2012, Shanghai, China 269543, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA).
    2. Wildraut, Christiane & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Technik Als Beitrag Für Mehr Tierwohl In Der Schweinehaltung Aus Sicht Von Landwirten," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262001, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:199775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.