IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ccsesa/230293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison between Conventional Tilled and Bicropped Winter Wheat Grown in Monoculture over Four Years

Author

Listed:
  • Finnan, J. M.
  • Burke, J. I.
  • Thomas, T. M.

Abstract

A four year experiment was conducted at a site in the south-east of Ireland in which medium and high input conventional winter wheat production systems were compared to no input and low input systems in which winter wheat was direct drilled into an understory of white clover. Whole crop and grain yields from all systems were strongly related to external input levels, yields from bicropped treatments were poor. Nitrogen uptake and grain yields from the conventional treatments declined during the course of the study whereas nitrogen uptake and yields from bicropped treatments were more stable. Fertiliser N application significantly depressed biological production efficiency and altered biomass partitioning. The proportion of biomass partitioned to the stem decreased with fertiliser N, differences between treatments persisted until final harvest. Although the clover sward was still present in the fourth year, this component of the bicrop was gradually replaced by weeds as the experiment progressed in spite of several attempts to control weeds. It is suggested that further research is needed to identify a clover management strategy which ensures the persistence of the white clover sward and allows it to enrich soil fertility in such a way as to be of benefit to the accompanying wheat crop.

Suggested Citation

  • Finnan, J. M. & Burke, J. I. & Thomas, T. M., 2015. "A Comparison between Conventional Tilled and Bicropped Winter Wheat Grown in Monoculture over Four Years," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230293
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.230293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230293/files/P3-p24-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.230293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ccsenet.org/sar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.