IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/auagre/285014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-compliance with Market Specifications in a Victorian Pasture-fed Beef Value Chain1

Author

Listed:
  • Crawford, Maria
  • Ferrier, Greg
  • Griffith, Garry

Abstract

Pasture-fed beef is being increasingly demanded by global beef consumers. However, pasture-fed beef value chains are struggling to maintain continuity of supply and consistent quality of product year round. Pasture-based production systems are influenced extensively by environmental conditions, pasture species, grazing management and livestock management systems. This variability, compounded by variability in market outcomes, could have a significant impact on the long term viability and profitability of producers in the value chain. This study aimed to assess the level of non-compliance in one southern pasture-fed value chain, with the intention of using the results to focus further work on areas of production and supply most critical to sustaining the market. Nineteen months of carcass grading data over 2012 and 2013 from almost 63,000 cattle were evaluated to determine the levels of non-compliance with the relevant company specifications. Hot standard carcass weight, P8 fat depth and sex were the carcass attributes that were compared and analysed. The 2012 data set comprised 3,905 heifers and 9,922 steers. Some 66% of the heifers and 62% of the steers did not meet the preferred company specifications for carcass weight and fat depth. For heifers, the cost of non-compliance was estimated to be $63 per carcass and for steers it was $47 per carcass. The 2013 data set comprised 19,099 heifers and 30,014 steers. A total of 78% of the heifers did not meet the highest value specification on the grid, with more than 50% of heifer carcasses being too light. Just on 60% of steer carcasses did not meet the 2013 weight and fat specifications with 39% of all the steers being overweight. The foregone value in non-compliance for heifers was estimated to be $84 per carcass and, for steers, $87 per carcass. Across the whole dataset, the weighted average cost of non-compliance was $78 per carcass.

Suggested Citation

  • Crawford, Maria & Ferrier, Greg & Griffith, Garry, 2017. "Non-compliance with Market Specifications in a Victorian Pasture-fed Beef Value Chain1," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 25.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:285014
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285014/files/AAR-Vol-25-Paper-3-Crawford-et-al-1228g1n.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:285014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agrifood.info/review/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.