Author
Listed:
- Babalola, Temitope Seun
- Fasina, Oluwadamilola
- Shittu, Olubunmi Samuel
- Ajayi, Samuel Ojo
- Ilori, Augustus Oludotun Akinmayowa
Abstract
The development of recommendations that are adoptable by farmers to meet their goals is key to the introduction of improved crop management practices to farmers. An on-farm experiment was conducted to evaluate maize production under farmers (M1) and improved (M2) cultivation and management in three locations (Kabba, Ejiba, and Anyigba) of the southern Guinea Savannah zone of Nigeria. A land suitability evaluation, an evaluation of the yield of maize, and an economic analysis of the two management practices were carried out. Kabba has a potential suitability index of 32.76 and was rated S3 (marginally suitable); Ejiba and Kabba are 84 and 95, respectively; they were rated S1 (highly suitable). The yield performance of maize is in the order of Ejiba>Anyigba>Kabba for location and M2>M1 for management practices. For every $1.00 invested in the adoption of improved cultivation and management practices, the farmer will recover the $1.00 and get an additional $0.4285, $0.6850, and $0.9349 in Kabba, Ejiba, and Ayingba, respectively. The improved management practices are recommended to farmers in the agro-ecological zone. This study established that agronomic experiments should not be limited to field experimentation levels, and the importance of the economic implications of agronomic research findings was emphasized.
Suggested Citation
Babalola, Temitope Seun & Fasina, Oluwadamilola & Shittu, Olubunmi Samuel & Ajayi, Samuel Ojo & Ilori, Augustus Oludotun Akinmayowa, 2025.
"The Transformation From Agronomic Experiment to Practical Advice For Farmers: A Case Study with Maize in the Southern Guinea Savannah Region of Nigeria,"
AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 17(2), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aolpei:364701
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364701
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:364701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.