Author
Listed:
- Ismail, Izaitul Aida
- Zaini, Mohd Rasdi
- Mazran, Noor Shuhaina Shaikh
- Hasin, Ahmad Khairuman Mohd
Abstract
The rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) began to establish itself in Malaysia with the emergence of coconut cultivation. Rhinoceros beetles were well adapted to survive on oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) trees. Different host plants could have different interactions and food preferences with the Rhinoceros beetle against their host plant, even within the same family. Additionally, climatic change, particularly rainfall, could also influence the population dynamics of O. rhinoceros especially in terms of the biological aspect of the pest. This study was carried out to evaluate the difference in population of rhinoceros beetles between oil palm and coconut palm as a preference host comparison in relation to the climatic factors on the plantation scale. The population of rhinoceros beetles was found to be higher in oil palm as compared to coconut palm. It can be concluded that rhinoceros beetles highly prefer oil palms when compared to coconut palms. This study highlighted the importance of planting similar families in order to reduce the risk of pest attacks. This study also found that climate is one of the factors influences the population dynamics of rhinoceros beetles and puts pressure on plants, subsequently making it a favorable condition for rhinoceros beetles in the field. Interestingly, female rhinoceros beetle in an oil palm field was significantly correlated with the rainfall. Therefore, preventive measures need to be taken during the rainy season, considering the high risk of planting nearby and/or similar plants.
Suggested Citation
Ismail, Izaitul Aida & Zaini, Mohd Rasdi & Mazran, Noor Shuhaina Shaikh & Hasin, Ahmad Khairuman Mohd, 2023.
"Population’s preference of rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) between oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and coconut palm (Cocos nucifera l.): Contributing to pest’s controlling strategy,"
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(04), January.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342421
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342421
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.