IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjfr/405331.html

Effect of Blending and the Simultaneous Ingestion of a Probiotic Containing Oxalate-Degrading Bacteria on Oxalate Absorption

Author

Listed:
  • Liebman, Michael
  • Walukano, Jane

Abstract

Both a high dietary oxalate intake and increased gastrointestinal absorption can lead to elevated urinary oxalate, a risk factor for kidney stone formation. Numerous studies have assessed whether daily ingestion of a probiotic containing oxalate-degrading bacteria can reduce urinary oxalate/oxalate absorption, but it appears only one previous study assessed whether the simultaneous ingestion of oxalate-degrading probiotic bacteria consumed with an oxalate load can exert this effect. This was assessed in the present study in a population of 11 healthy non-stone formers (6 males, 5 females), aged 21 – 37 y, using the probiotic VSL#3®. A spinach-sweet potato mixture provided an oxalate dose of 534 mg and urine samples were collected for a 22 h period post-oxalate ingestion. An additional objective was to assess the effect of blending oxalate-containing foods on oxalate absorption. The overall results suggested that the spinach and sweet potato provided oxalate of low bioavailability. Changing the texture of these foods by blending did not have an effect on oxalate absorption nor was VSL#3® effective in reducing urinary oxalate levels. VSL#3® may have been more effective if the oxalate dose had been provided in a more bioavailable form leading to a higher initial oxalate absorption/urinary oxalate excretion.

Suggested Citation

  • Liebman, Michael & Walukano, Jane, 2015. "Effect of Blending and the Simultaneous Ingestion of a Probiotic Containing Oxalate-Degrading Bacteria on Oxalate Absorption," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/405331/files/54211-194698-2-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ccsenet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.