IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjfr/405330.html

The Ergonomic Design of Bent-Handled Wok for Female Cooks’ Wok Flipping Task

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Swei-Pi
  • Jen, Chien-Chung
  • Yang, Chien-Hsin
  • Chien, Te-Hong
  • Lin, Chia-Hui

Abstract

Conventional straight-handled woks and the ergonomic bent-handled woks under different wok sizes were evaluated using the psychophysical approach. Twelve female subjects were tested using 15 different woks in a random order. The independent variables were the wok handle angle (with two angles of 25˚, 10˚ for traditional wok, and three angles of -5˚, -20˚ and -35˚ for bent-handled wok) and the wok size (with three diameters of 33 cm, 36 cm and 39 cm). The criterion measures included maximum acceptable weight of flipping (MAWF), wrist angle and subjective rating. The results showed both the handle angle and wok size significantly affected the maximum acceptable weight of flipping, wrist angle and subjective rating. The bent-handled wok is superior to the straight-handled wok, and the size-weight illusion effect is significant. In general, a small wok (33 cm diameter) with an ergonomic bent handle (-35˚) is ideal for females to decrease the risk of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders when performing the flipping task.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Swei-Pi & Jen, Chien-Chung & Yang, Chien-Hsin & Chien, Te-Hong & Lin, Chia-Hui, 2015. "The Ergonomic Design of Bent-Handled Wok for Female Cooks’ Wok Flipping Task," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/405330/files/53678-194675-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ccsenet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.