IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjfr/405329.html

Consumer Responses to Proposed Instructions for Cooking Mechanically Tenderized Beef Steaks

Author

Listed:
  • Klassen, M. D.
  • Gill, C. O.

Abstract

Mechanical tenderizing of beef can result in bacteria, which may include enteric pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, from the surface being carried into previously sterile deep tissues. A telephone survey of 1021 Canadian consumers was conducted during September 2013 to determine current steak cooking practices, and responses to proposed instructions for cooking to ensure microbiological safety intended for labels on packs of mechanically tenderized beef (MTB) steaks. The responses indicated that 95% of Canadian consumers preferably cook steaks to a medium rare or more well done condition while 66% turn steaks over twice or more during cooking. These practices are those required to ensure the microbiological safety of MTB steaks. Apparently, over 80% of consumers would have no difficulty understanding, and would be likely to follow instructions that specify these practices for the safe cooking of MTB steaks.

Suggested Citation

  • Klassen, M. D. & Gill, C. O., 2015. "Consumer Responses to Proposed Instructions for Cooking Mechanically Tenderized Beef Steaks," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/405329/files/41439-194415-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ccsenet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.