IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjfr/405237.html

Sensory Evaluation of Non-Dairy Probiotic Beverages

Author

Listed:
  • He, Shilin
  • Hekmat, Sharareh

Abstract

This study measured the survival of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 in non-dairy probiotic beverages over a 28-day storage period and to determine which sample was most preferred on measures of appearance, consistency, flavour, texture, and overall acceptability. Three non-dairy samples and one control milk sample were prepared. The non-dairy samples were soy (1:3 product-to-water ratio), almond (1:3), and peanut (1:5). L. rhamnosus GR-1 remained viable (107 CFU/ml) in all samples over 28 days storage period and changes over time were dependent on the sample (P=0.03). The results of the sensory evaluation (n=90) showed that the soy and peanut samples were significantly different (P<0.03) from the control milk sample in appearance, consistency, flavour, texture, and overall acceptability. The almond sample was not rated significantly different (P>0.05) from the milk control in all categories. The results of this study suggest that probiotic almond milk may be a feasible substitute for conventional probiotic milk beverages, particularly for vegetarians who cannot consume dairy products and individuals with lactose intolerance.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Shilin & Hekmat, Sharareh, 2014. "Sensory Evaluation of Non-Dairy Probiotic Beverages," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/405237/files/40910-150583-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:405237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ccsenet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.