IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjfr/404949.html

Sensory Analysis of Pawpaw (Asimina triloba) Pulp Puree: Consumer Appraisal and Descriptive Lexicon

Author

Listed:
  • Brannan, Robert
  • Salabak, Dane
  • Holben, David

Abstract

Consumer and descriptive sensory analysis was performed on pawpaw pulp. Consumer sensory analysis showed that mango was preferred compared to the pawpaw, but that only one-third of those who preferred the mango were correctly able to identify it. Consumers generated 25 flavor descriptors for pawpaw pulp, with banana and mango being the most identified. Descriptive sensory analysis was performed on pawpaw pulp that was stored frozen in the presence or absence of air and with and without heat treatment. Differences in color were detected, however no differences in any of the sensory attributes were detected during 12 months of frozen storage, suggesting that the flavor of pawpaw pulp is stable during frozen storage. The comprehensive analysis of the sensory and quality of pawpaw pulp described in this paper, including the development of a defined, standardized pawpaw sensory lexicon, is an important step in the evolution of pawpaw research.

Suggested Citation

  • Brannan, Robert & Salabak, Dane & Holben, David, 2012. "Sensory Analysis of Pawpaw (Asimina triloba) Pulp Puree: Consumer Appraisal and Descriptive Lexicon," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 1(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:404949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404949/files/13510-45380-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjfr:404949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ccsenet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.