IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v4(637)y2023i4(637)p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the financial performance of Turkish bank groups during the Covid-19 pandemic with the TOPSIS method

Author

Listed:
  • Levent SEZAL

    (Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study was conducted to measure and compare the financial performance of public, domestic private and foreign capital deposit bank groups operating in Turkey in 2020-2021 and 2022, covering the Covid-19 pandemic period. For this purpose, TOPSIS method, one of the multicriteria decision-making techniques, was used. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that domestic deposit banks with private capital performed the best in 2020 and 2021, while deposit banks with foreign capital performed better in 2022. It was concluded that state-owned banks performed worse than domestic private and foreign-owned banks during the pandemic period.

Suggested Citation

  • Levent SEZAL, 2023. "Analyzing the financial performance of Turkish bank groups during the Covid-19 pandemic with the TOPSIS method," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(4(637), W), pages 5-16, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:4(637):y:2023:i:4(637):p:5-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1696.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1696&rid=153
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanke, Peter & Azad, Abul Kalam & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2018. "Efficiency in BRICS banking under data vagueness: A two-stage fuzzy approach," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 58-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanke, Peter & Tsionas, Mike G. & Chen, Zhongfei & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio, 2020. "Dynamic network DEA and SFA models for accounting and financial indicators with an analysis of super-efficiency in stochastic frontiers: An efficiency comparison in OECD banking," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 456-468.
    2. M.V. Leonov, 2021. "Review of Modern Approaches for Assessing the Effectiveness of Banking," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(2), pages 294-326.
    3. Marc Sanchez-Roger & María Dolores Oliver-Alfonso & Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa, 2019. "Fuzzy Logic and Its Uses in Finance: A Systematic Review Exploring Its Potential to Deal with Banking Crises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:4(637):y:2023:i:4(637):p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.