IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agh/journl/v27y2026i1p37-51.html

On the structural design of the EU Inter-TSO Compensation mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Dubravko Sabolić

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

This paper examines the structural design of the EU Inter-TSO Compensation (ITC) mechanism, which aims to remunerate transmission system operators for the costs associated with cross-border electricity flows. Building on the established legal and institutional framework and earlier analytical critiques, the paper develops a new stylized three-zone counterexample to assess how the mechanism allocates costs under realistic network interactions. The analysis shows that settlement rules based on boundary-flow proxies can assign compensation in ways that diverge from the physical origin of network burdens and may fail to penalize behavior that increases reliance on external networks. This finding complements existing paradoxes in the literature and highlights how proxy-based clearing can mute or distort operational and investment incentives, particularly in meshed networks with internal congestion. The contribution is analytical rather than empirical and is intended to clarify the scope and limitations of what the ITC mechanism can reasonably be expected to achieve, given its current design and informational basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubravko Sabolić, 2026. "On the structural design of the EU Inter-TSO Compensation mechanism," Managerial Economics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(1), pages 37-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:agh:journl:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:37-51
    DOI: 10.7494/manage.2026.27.1.37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.7494/manage.2026.27.1.37
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7494/manage.2026.27.1.37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agh:journl:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:37-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lukasz Lach (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzaghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.