IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/afj/journl/v5y2003i1p16-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis on Thinly-Traded Markets: The Case of Four African Stock Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Chipo Mlambo
  • Nicholas Biekpe
  • Eon Smit

    (University of Stellenbosch Business School)

Abstract

This paper investigates the random walk behaviour of stock returns on four African stock markets taking into account the thin-trading effect. Worthy noting is the way returns are calculated using trade-to-trade approach and adjusted to account for the thin-trading effect. The adjustment was done by dividing each trade-to-trade return with the number of days between trades. A test was performed to find if this adjustment method is justifiable. The findings were that there is a positive relationship between the absolute trade-to-trade returns and the number of days between trades. The adjusted stock returns were also tested for normality, which was rejected on all the four markets. in testing if stock returns follow a random walk, two simple traditional testing methods, that is, the serial correlation test and the runs test were used. The findings were that almost half of the stocks on each of the four markets showed significant serial correlation. There was therefore not enough evidence to accept the hypothesis of a random walk.

Suggested Citation

  • Chipo Mlambo & Nicholas Biekpe & Eon Smit, 2003. "Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis on Thinly-Traded Markets: The Case of Four African Stock Markets," The African Finance Journal, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 16-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:afj:journl:v:5:y:2003:i:1:p:16-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_finj.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graham Smith & Aneta Dyakova, 2014. "African Stock Markets: Efficiency and Relative Predictability," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 82(2), pages 258-275, June.
    2. Michael A. Noakes & Kanshukan Rajaratnam, 2016. "Testing market efficiency on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange using the overlapping serial test," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 273-300, August.
    3. Emenike, Kalu O., 2008. "Efficiency across Time: Evidence from the Nigerian Stock Exchange," MPRA Paper 22901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Vladimir Tsenkov, 2011. "Efficient-Market Hypothesis and the Global Financial Crises – on the Example of SOFIX, DJIA and DAX Indexes," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 53-88.
    5. Graham Smith, 2008. "Liquidity And The Informational Efficiency Of African Stock Markets," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 76(2), pages 161-175, June.
    6. Mlambo, Chipo & Biekpe, Nicholas, 2007. "The efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from ten African stock markets," MPRA Paper 25968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afj:journl:v:5:y:2003:i:1:p:16-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk De Doncker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afrgrza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.