IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/afj/journ4/v8y2023i8p10-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why rating agencies are resisting changing their business approach in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Misheck Mutize

    (African Union Support Program)

Abstract

The three dominant international credit rating agencies – Moody’s, Fitch and S&P – have been challenged on instances of omitting material information in the assessment of creditworthiness of African countries. Some analysts have argued that the omission of key information is a deliberate conservative approach to keep ratings in Africa low and maintaining their market power. Others have associated these omissions with lack of understanding of the domestic macroeconomic context of Africa by the rating agencies. The several errors made by the rating agencies in their commentaries, reports and announcements are proof of fundamental defects that still exist in organisational internal control mechanisms and structures. This has prompted critics to argue that the agencies are not putting sufficient effort to either understand African economies or address weak internal systems for their continent’s operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Misheck Mutize, 2023. "Why rating agencies are resisting changing their business approach in Africa," Development Finance Agenda, Chartered Institute of Development Finance, vol. 8(8), pages 10-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:8:y:2023:i:8:p:10-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-defa_v8_n8_a3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:8:y:2023:i:8:p:10-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk De Doncker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afrgrza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.