IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/afj/journ4/v10y2025i4p6-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the (vaccine) price 'right'? Better vaccine process valuation techniques lead to lower firm break-even prices and improved payer bargaining power

Author

Listed:
  • Danny Cassimon
  • Peter-Jan Engelen

    (University of Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

In recent years, a lot of discussion and criticism has emerged around pharmaceutical firms setting prices of their mpox, COVID-19 and other vaccines 'unfairly' high, leading to huge problems of equitable access. While the literature focuses on the unequal price set- ting bargaining power between these firms and the payers (donors/public health sector agencies) and the information asymmetry and lack of firm transparency on exact cost structures as major causes, hardly any attention has been paid to one particular dimension of vaccine pricing, which relates to the inappropriate- ness of the conventional Net Present Value (NPV) based valuation method used to determine an accurate firm break-even price. Building on our recent research (Engelen & Cassimon, 2025), this contribution presents compound real option analysis as a more accurate valu- ation technique, leading to a lower firm break-even price. It then applies this to a particular case and draws some policy conclusions for payer bargaining power in price setting negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Danny Cassimon & Peter-Jan Engelen, 2025. "Is the (vaccine) price 'right'? Better vaccine process valuation techniques lead to lower firm break-even prices and improved payer bargaining power," Development Finance Agenda, Chartered Institute of Development Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 6-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:6-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-defa_v10_n4_a2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:6-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk De Doncker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afrgrza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.