IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/journl/v7y2021i1p200-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Discrediting of Competing Trademarks - Between Multiple Qualification Option and Qualification Impediment

Author

Listed:
  • Iulian MORARU

Abstract

Discrediting competing trademarks consists in the spread of certain information regarding the trademarks owned by the competitor of the undertaking realizing the disparaging actions. Relating the idea to the legislative provisions in force of the Republic of Moldova, it can be inferred that there are two options for qualifying such a conduct - according to the rules of unfair competition and in accordance with the rules of dishonest advertising. In such circumstances, the obvious question raised is whether the qualification will be done in accordance with one or another relevant legal norm. This aspect requires a broad clarification in the sense of offering viable alternative solutions and corresponding to the various practical factual situations. In this context, it is necessary to establish defined criteria in material and procedural terms in order to achieve a clear delimitation between different qualifying vectors. Circumstantially, there is a need to resort to the approach of domestic practice in this matter, as well as to the treatment of legislative, theoretical and practical trends in other states and legal systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulian MORARU, 2021. "The Discrediting of Competing Trademarks - Between Multiple Qualification Option and Qualification Impediment," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 7(1), pages 200-217, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:200-217
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_71/EEJRS_Issue_71_200-217_MOR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discrediting; trademark; unfair competition; dishonest advertising; qualification.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:200-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.