IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aejmic/v16y2024i2p39-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multigame Contact: A Double-Edged Sword for Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Laferrière
  • Joao Montez
  • Catherine Roux
  • Christian Thöni

Abstract

We study experimentally the effect of multigame contact on cooperation, with each subject playing a pair of indefinitely repeated prisoner's dilemmas. Multigame contact is present if a subject plays both games with a single partner, and it is absent if each of the two games is played with a different partner. In contrast to the theoretical prediction, multigame contact does not increase overall cooperation rates. Nonetheless, multigame contact systematically affects behavior and outcomes, acting like a double-edged sword, in the sense that subjects link decisions across games and, consequently, mutual cooperation and mutual defection in both games become more likely.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Laferrière & Joao Montez & Catherine Roux & Christian Thöni, 2024. "Multigame Contact: A Double-Edged Sword for Cooperation," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 39-61, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:39-61
    DOI: 10.1257/mic.20210377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20210377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/E184141V1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20210377.appx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20210377.slds
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20210377.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/mic.20210377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:39-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.