IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Endogenous Choice of Subsidy Instruments in Imperfectly Competitive Markets: A Unit Subsidy versus an Ad Valorem Subsidy

Listed author(s):
  • Nobuo Akai
  • Hikaru Ogawa
  • Yoshitomo Ogawa

This paper analyzes the endogenous choice problem of subsidy instruments as production expansion (export-promotion) policies. We consider a two-region economy in which firms produce a homogeneous good and sell it in a third region. The government in each region provides a production subsidy to the domestic firm in either a unit or an ad valorem form. Our main result is that selection of a unit subsidy is the dominant strategy for each region and it is welfare superior to an ad valorem subsidy, which offers a justification for the unit subsidy assumption made in the existing literature. We explain the intuition behind this result using the properties of the best responses.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.15609/annaeconstat2009.113-114.81
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by GENES in its journal Annals Of Economics and Statistics.

Volume (Year): (2014)
Issue (Month): 113-114 ()
Pages: 81-98

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2014:i:113-114:p:81-98
DOI: 10.15609/annaeconstat2009.113-114.81
Contact details of provider: Postal:
3, avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex

Phone: 01.41.17.51.55
Web page: https://annals.ensae.fr/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2014:i:113-114:p:81-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurent Linnemer)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.