IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2011i101-102p7-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the Special Issue on New Developments in Social Choice and Welfare Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Fleurbaey
  • Dominique Lepelley
  • Vincent Merlin

Abstract

Preliminary versions of most of the papers in this special issue of Annals of Economics and Statistics were presented at the annual conference of the ADRES (Association pour le Développement de la Recherche en Economie et Statistiques). This conference, untitled ``New Developments in Social Choice and Welfare Theories - Conferences in Honor of Maurice Salles" took place at the University of Caen Basse Normandy on June 10th-12th 2009. The articles collected here examine three aspects of modern social choice theory: the measure of inequality and welfare, the analysis of voting rules and voting behaviors, and the Arrovian aggregation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Fleurbaey & Dominique Lepelley & Vincent Merlin, 2011. "Introduction to the Special Issue on New Developments in Social Choice and Welfare Theories," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 7-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:7-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41615471
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Gravel & Benoît Tarroux, 2011. "Freedom-Based Measurement of Living Standard," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 37-69.
    2. Marc Fleurbaey & Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark, 2008. "Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarism : Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls," Post-Print halshs-00337593, HAL.
    3. Antoinette Baujard & Herrade Igersheim & Thomas Senne, 2011. "The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 149-186.
    4. Boniface Mbih & Xingyu Zhao, 2011. "No-Show Paradoxes under Parliamentary Agendas," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 127-147.
    5. Maurice Salles, 2005. "The launching of ‘social choice and welfare’ and the creation of the ‘society for social choice and welfare’," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 25(2), pages 557-564, December.
    6. Fabrice Barthelemy & Mathieu Martin, 2011. "A Comparison Between the Methods of Apportionment Using Power Indices: the Case of the US Presidential Elections," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 87-106.
    7. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:02 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:04 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Maurice Salles, 2016. "Social choice," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 36, pages 518-537, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:08 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:06 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Frédéric Chantreuil & Alain Trannoy, 2011. "Inequality Decomposition Values," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 13-36.
    13. William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Hatem Smaoui, 2011. "The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules with Mutually Coherent Voter Preferences: A Borda Compromise," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 107-125.
    14. Fleurbaey,Marc & Salles,Maurice & Weymark,John A. (ed.), 2008. "Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521640930, October.
    15. Dominique Lepelley & Laurent Vidu, 2011. "Measurement of Voting Power: a Preliminary Analysis of an Historical French Electoral Episode Through Simulations," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 71-85.
    16. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:03 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Marc Fleurbaey & Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark, 2008. "Justice, Political Liberalism and Utilitarianism," Post-Print hal-00246415, HAL.
    19. Barnett,William A. & Moulin,Hervé & Salles,Maurice & Schofield,Norman J. (ed.), 1995. "Social Choice, Welfare, and Ethics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521443401, October.
    20. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:09 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:07 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt, 2020. "Arrovian Aggregation of Convex Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 799-844, March.
    2. Askoura, Youcef & Billot, Antoine, 2021. "Social decision for a measure society," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Aitor Calo-Blanco, 2015. "Health, responsibility and taxation with a fresh start," Working Papers 15.06, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    4. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2015. "The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 463-478, November.
    5. Dietrich, Franz, 2021. "Fully Bayesian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Menevis UZBAY PIRILI & Mustafa PIRILI, 2015. "A New Social Contract: Rethinking the Role of the State Towards Post- 2015 Development Agenda," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 253-264.
    7. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "Step-by-step negotiations and utilitarianism," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 433-445, June.
    8. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2019. "Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(4), pages 741-751, April.
    9. Thomson, William, 2011. "Chapter Twenty-One - Fair Allocation Rules," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 393-506, Elsevier.
    10. Christopher Chambers & Takashi Hayashi, 2012. "Money-metric utilitarianism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 809-831, October.
    11. Giacomo Valletta, 2014. "Health, fairness and taxation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(1), pages 101-140, June.
    12. Herrade Igersheim, 2022. "Rawls and the Economists: The (Im)possible Dialogue," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 73(6), pages 1013-1037.
    13. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2009. "Walrasian social orderings in exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 16-22, January.
    14. Marc Fleurbaey, 2012. "Social preferences for the evaluation of procedures," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 599-614, July.
    15. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2016. "Egalitarian–utilitarian bounds in Nash’s bargaining problem," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 427-442, March.
    16. Marc Fleurbaey, 2009. "Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1029-1075, December.
    17. Aki Lehtinen, 2011. "A welfarist critique of social choice theory," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 359-381, July.
    18. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    19. Herrade Igersheim, 2006. "Libéralisme de la liberté versus libéralisme du bonheur. Le cas du paradoxe libéral-parétien," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 389-398.
    20. Bloch, Francis & Dutta, Bhaskar, 2009. "Correlated equilibria, incomplete information and coalitional deviations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 721-728, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2011:i:101-102:p:7-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.