IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2004i75-76p197-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedonic Independence and Taste-homogeneity of Organizations with Crowding Types

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Conley
  • Myrna Wooders

Abstract

We consider a model of a local public goods economy with differentiated crowding that distinguishes between the tastes and crowding characteristics of agents. Crowding characteristics are those aspects of an agent that have a direct external effect on other members of the coalition to which he belongs. In such an economy, it is possible to form completely taste-homogeneous organizations while still taking advantage of the full array of possible crowding effects (labor complementarities, for example). We find, however, that it is nevertheless possible for taste-heterogeneous organizations to be strictly superior to taste-homogeneous organization with the same distribution of crowding types. We introduce a notion of hedonic independence, which stipulates that the values of an agent's characteristics (his taste type and his crowding type) are independent. We show that if hedonic independence is satisfied, then organizations in core and equilibrium states of the economy are essentially taste-homogeneous. A number of examples illustrate the application of our approach to several sorts of organizations. We conclude by discussing how hedonic independence might arise from market interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Conley & Myrna Wooders, 2004. "Hedonic Independence and Taste-homogeneity of Organizations with Crowding Types," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 75-76, pages 197-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2004:i:75-76:p:197-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20079101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2004:i:75-76:p:197-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.