IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1997i47p51-63.html

On the Efficiency of Retaliation Rules in International Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Ginsburgh
  • Shlomo Weber

Abstract

Though retaliation to discriminatory measures taken by a trading partner are made possible by international treaties (GATT and WTO in particular), it is rarely used. We give theoretical reasons for which this has been the case. We also show that the retaliation mechanism which is built into the GATT-WTO rules prevents tariff wars, but does not necessarily lead to free trade. We provide an alternative retaliation rule which yields free trade as the unique equilibrium of the tariff game.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 1997. "On the Efficiency of Retaliation Rules in International Trade," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 47, pages 51-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1997:i:47:p:51-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076082
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin H. Liebman & Kasaundra M. Tomlin, 2008. "Safeguards and Retaliatory Threats," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(2), pages 351-376, May.
    2. Benjamin Liebman & Kasaundra Tomlin, 2015. "World Trade Organization sanctions, implementation, and retaliation," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 715-745, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1997:i:47:p:51-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.