IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/yid689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problems Found In The Reports Of Federal Universities. Who Is Guilty? What Is To Be Done?

Author

Listed:
  • A. S. Antonova
  • D. I. Izmest'ev

Abstract

This article explores the process of annual development program report preparation by federal university. Risk analysis of report creation, endorsement and approval phases is done based on proposed process description. Probable negative implications of undesirable outcomes are described. The attention is paid to typical problems the universities face while preparing a report and the guidelines on risk mitigation are proposed. As a basis for the analysis the authors use some real examples of universities' functioning as well as best business practice, adapted to the goals and objectives of federal universities.

Suggested Citation

  • A. S. Antonova & D. I. Izmest'ev, 0. "The Problems Found In The Reports Of Federal Universities. Who Is Guilty? What Is To Be Done?," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, issue 1.
    • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/689/690
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.