IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2026id2213.html

Assessing the Impact of the “5-100 Project†on the Internal Transformation of Russian Elite Universities

Author

Listed:
  • M. M. Sokolov

Abstract

  One of the main (if not the primary) goals of the “5-100 Project†declared to be the internal transformation of Russian universities. It was assumed that the need to meet the program’s indicators would lead participating universities to recognize the necessity of deep reforms.  The intended outcome was convergence toward the model of a research university, in which (a) most faculty identify as researchers and devote a significant share of their working time to research; (b) employment contracts are flexible and provide substantial rewards for academic achievements; (c) hiring takes place on the open market, while networking mechanisms and inbreeding play a smaller role; and (d) faculty are widely involved in scientific communication with an international audience.  We use data from a survey of economists affiliated with Russian universities (N = 5,025), conducted in October–December 2021, to assess the extent to which, by the conclusion of the Project, participating universities differed from other Russian universities on these parameters. The results are mixed: although for most variables there is a statistically significant difference between participating and other universities, the effect (a) is comparatively small, and (b) is largely due to a single university—the Higher School of Economics—and disappears once its faculty are excluded from the sample. For example, faculty at other participating universities do not teach fewer classroom hours, are not more mobile, are not hired on the open labor market, do not have greater experience publishing internationally, and only to a limited extent identify more strongly with the role of researcher or engage more deeply with foreign-language literature. The data cast doubt on whether the Project resulted in the internal transformation of most participating universities rather than in superficial optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • M. M. Sokolov, 2026. "Assessing the Impact of the “5-100 Project†on the Internal Transformation of Russian Elite Universities," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 30(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2213
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2026.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2213/1295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey E. Guskov & Denis V. Kosyakov & Irina V. Selivanova, 2018. "Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1053-1080, November.
    2. Andrey Lovakov & Anna Panova & Ivan Sterligov & Maria Yudkevich, 2021. "Does government support of a few leading universities have a broader impact on the higher education system? Evaluation of the Russian University Excellence Initiative [The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 240-255.
    3. Matveeva, Nataliya & Sterligov, Ivan & Yudkevich, Maria, 2021. "The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    4. Linda Butler, 2003. "Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 39-46, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Lovakov & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, 2025. "Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1813-1829, March.
    2. Leonid Gokhberg & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Maxim Kotsemir, 2023. "From the Soviet Union to the Russian Federation: publication activity dynamics along the evolution of national science policies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 6195-6246, November.
    3. Mona Farouk Ali, 2024. "Is there a “difference-in-difference”? The impact of scientometric evaluation on the evolution of international publications in Egyptian universities and research centres," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 1119-1154, February.
    4. Denis Kosyakov & Andrey Guskov, 2022. "Reasons and consequences of changes in Russian research assessment policies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4609-4630, August.
    5. Çetin Önder & Mehmet Sevkli & Taner Altinok & Cengiz Tavukçuoǧlu, 2008. "Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 543-560, September.
    6. Prakhov, Ilya, 2023. "Indicators of higher education quality and salaries of university graduates in Russia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Carmen Osuna & Laura Cruz-Castro & Luis Sanz-Menéndez, 2011. "Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 575-592, March.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:gxbn5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Carmen Osuna & Laura Cruz Castro & Luis Sanz Menéndez, 2010. "Knocking down some Assumptions about the Effects of Evaluation Systems on Publications," Working Papers 1010, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    10. Aybars Oruc, 2021. "Requirements for Productivity in the Academic Environment," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 1-40, November.
    11. Tatiana Lisitskaya & Pavel Taranov & Ekaterina Ugnich & Vladimir Pislyakov, 2024. "Pillar Universities in Russia: Bibliometrics of ‘the second best’," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 365-383, February.
    12. Xin Gu & Karen Blackmore, 2017. "Quantitative study on Australian academic science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1009-1035, November.
    13. Clemens Blümel & Alexander Schniedermann, 2020. "Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 711-728, July.
    14. Duanhong Zhang & Wenjia Ding & Yang Wang & Siwen Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Role of International Research Collaboration in Building China’s World-Class Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Linda Sīle & Raf Vanderstraeten, 2019. "Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: the case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 71-91, January.
    16. Anastasia E. Sudakova & Dahel Mustafa Saleh Dahel, 2023. "Funding the Higher Education System: International Experience and Russian Practice," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 9(2), pages 207-225.
    17. Vanclay, Jerome K., 2011. "An evaluation of the Australian Research Council's journal ranking," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 265-274.
    18. Niccolo Cattadori & Edoardo Frattola & Elena Lazzaro, 2025. "Excellence funds, excellent outcomes? Lessons from Italian university departments," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1505, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Tindaro Cicero, 2012. "What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 1005-1017, December.
    20. Dorte Henriksen, 2016. "The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 455-476, May.
    21. Anna Abalkina, 2024. "Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(4), pages 395-422, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.