IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2026id2213.html

Assessing the Impact of the “5-100 Project†on the Internal Transformation of Russian Elite Universities

Author

Listed:
  • M. M. Sokolov

Abstract

  One of the main (if not the primary) goals of the “5-100 Project†declared to be the internal transformation of Russian universities. It was assumed that the need to meet the program’s indicators would lead participating universities to recognize the necessity of deep reforms.  The intended outcome was convergence toward the model of a research university, in which (a) most faculty identify as researchers and devote a significant share of their working time to research; (b) employment contracts are flexible and provide substantial rewards for academic achievements; (c) hiring takes place on the open market, while networking mechanisms and inbreeding play a smaller role; and (d) faculty are widely involved in scientific communication with an international audience.  We use data from a survey of economists affiliated with Russian universities (N = 5,025), conducted in October–December 2021, to assess the extent to which, by the conclusion of the Project, participating universities differed from other Russian universities on these parameters. The results are mixed: although for most variables there is a statistically significant difference between participating and other universities, the effect (a) is comparatively small, and (b) is largely due to a single university—the Higher School of Economics—and disappears once its faculty are excluded from the sample. For example, faculty at other participating universities do not teach fewer classroom hours, are not more mobile, are not hired on the open labor market, do not have greater experience publishing internationally, and only to a limited extent identify more strongly with the role of researcher or engage more deeply with foreign-language literature. The data cast doubt on whether the Project resulted in the internal transformation of most participating universities rather than in superficial optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • M. M. Sokolov, 2026. "Assessing the Impact of the “5-100 Project†on the Internal Transformation of Russian Elite Universities," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 30(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2213
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2026.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2213/1295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey E. Guskov & Denis V. Kosyakov & Irina V. Selivanova, 2018. "Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1053-1080, November.
    2. Andrey Lovakov & Anna Panova & Ivan Sterligov & Maria Yudkevich, 2021. "Does government support of a few leading universities have a broader impact on the higher education system? Evaluation of the Russian University Excellence Initiative [The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 240-255.
    3. Matveeva, Nataliya & Sterligov, Ivan & Yudkevich, Maria, 2021. "The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    4. Linda Butler, 2003. "Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 39-46, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Lovakov & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, 2025. "Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1813-1829, March.
    2. Leonid Gokhberg & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Maxim Kotsemir, 2023. "From the Soviet Union to the Russian Federation: publication activity dynamics along the evolution of national science policies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 6195-6246, November.
    3. Aydınoğlu, Arsev Umur & Özer, Özgür Kadir, 2026. "Research excellence is hard to sustain: Evidence from Japan's WPI initiative," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    4. Mona Farouk Ali, 2024. "Is there a “difference-in-difference”? The impact of scientometric evaluation on the evolution of international publications in Egyptian universities and research centres," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 1119-1154, February.
    5. Denis Kosyakov & Andrey Guskov, 2022. "Reasons and consequences of changes in Russian research assessment policies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4609-4630, August.
    6. Denis Kosyakov & Andrey Guskov, 2024. "Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1697-1717, March.
    7. repec:osf:socarx:gxbn5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nataliya Matveeva & Anuška Ferligoj, 2020. "Scientific collaboration in Russian universities before and after the excellence initiative Project 5-100," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2383-2407, September.
    9. Aleksander Galas & Aleksandra Pilat & Matilde Leonardi & Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, 2018. "Research Project Evaluation—Learnings from the PATHWAYS Project Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Carolin Michels & Ulrich Schmoch, 2014. "Impact of bibliometric studies on the publication behaviour of authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 369-385, January.
    11. Carmen Osuna & Laura Cruz Castro & Luis Sanz Menéndez, 2010. "Knocking down some Assumptions about the Effects of Evaluation Systems on Publications," Working Papers 1010, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    12. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, 2015. "The VQR, Italy's second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2202-2214, November.
    13. Matveeva, Nataliya & Sterligov, Ivan & Yudkevich, Maria, 2021. "The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    14. Xiaojie Fan & Hong Liu & Yang Wang & Yawen Wan & Duanhong Zhang, 2022. "Models of Internationalization of Higher Education in Developing Countries—A Perspective of International Research Collaboration in BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Lin Zhang & Zhe Cao & Gunnar Sivertsen & Dmitry Kochetkov, 2024. "The influence of geopolitics on research activity and international collaboration in science: the case of Russia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(10), pages 6007-6021, October.
    16. Renata Kudaibergenova & Sandugash Uzakbay & Asselya Makanova & Kymbat Ramadinkyzy & Erlan Kistaubayev & Ruslan Dussekeev & Kadyrzhan Smagulov, 2022. "Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: a case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 453-479, January.
    17. Ramón A. Feenstra & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2022. "Philosophers’ appraisals of bibliometric indicators and their use in evaluation: from recognition to knee-jerk rejection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2085-2103, April.
    18. Linda Sīle & Raf Vanderstraeten, 2019. "Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: the case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 71-91, January.
    19. Niccolo Cattadori & Edoardo Frattola & Elena Lazzaro, 2025. "Excellence funds, excellent outcomes? Lessons from Italian university departments," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1505, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Aralica, Zoran & Anić, Ivan-Damir & Škrinjarić, Bruno & Harmina, Anita & Vlačić, Ernest, 2025. "Critical factors driving innovations and patenting in academia in S3 area “Energy and Sustainable Environment”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. Alberto Anfossi & Alberto Ciolfi & Filippo Costa & Giorgio Parisi & Sergio Benedetto, 2016. "Large-scale assessment of research outputs through a weighted combination of bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 671-683, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.