Author
Listed:
- V. A. Larionova
- N. V. Goncharova
- L. V. Daineko
- V. A. Sokolova
Abstract
  The article examines universities’ strategic responses to the key challenges of the digital era, including rising stakeholder expectations, competition with EdTech companies, misalignment with labor market demands, and the need to rethink the university mission in the context of generative AI.  The relevance of the study stems from the need of universities at an early stage of transformation for reference points to inform long-term strategy development.  The methodology combines an analysis of academic literature (25 selected articles) with 30 in-depth interviews conducted with internationally recognized experts from leading universities (Stanford University, the University of Arizona, HSE University, the University of Reading, among others), as well as representatives of EdTech companies and the business sector. The study identifies five priority thematic areas for development, reflecting a consolidated expert consensus. The findings demonstrate that digital transformation has become a necessary condition for closing the gap with labor market requirements and requires close cooperation with business and EdTech providers. Practical recommendations for university leadership are formulated based on global best practices, including the transition to hybrid models, the implementation of project-based learning, the development of systems for recognizing micro-credentials, and a focus on fostering a new type of student mindset. Specific solutions are also proposed for resource-constrained universities.
Suggested Citation
V. A. Larionova & N. V. Goncharova & L. V. Daineko & V. A. Sokolova, 2026.
"The Future of Universities in the Digital World: Expert Foresight from Leading Global Universities,"
University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 29(4).
Handle:
RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2145
DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2025.04.030
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2026:id:2145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.