IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2023id1643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distance Education: Online Proctoring as a Tool for Assessing Learning Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • N. L. Antonova
  • S. B. Abramova

Abstract

The educational organizations’ urgent transition to distance learning because of the pandemic has actualized the problems of assessing the results of mastering the disciplines. Online proctoring is becoming one of the leading tools for control, providing an objective independent assessment of compliance with academic ethics. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze students’ attitude towards distance learning and their ideas on the opportunities, disadvantages, and prospects of online proctoring. The pilot study conducted in the spring of 2021 was empirically based on the results of online questionnaires answered by 200 undergraduate students of various scientific specialties and humanities at Ural Federal University (1–4 years). We also used the method of semi-structured interviews with 10 students who had had an experience of a final test using online proctoring systems. The data obtained show that the main difficulties faced by students within the distance learning process are the lack of direct contact with the teacher, enormous bulks of information to be learnt independently, the increased health burden, and technical failures. Despite the emerging barriers, the young have successfully mastered the educational platforms (MS Teams, Zoom, Google Meet) and practised in passing remote credits and exams. Online proctoring narrows the chances of informal passing final exams, however forming and developing risk-taking and inventiveness among students. This can be explained both by low demand for mastering general education disciplines and by poor design of test assignments. Technical failures within testing are another problem of proctoring. For distance education, online proctoring seems a promising and in-demand tool for students to assess the results of their learning in professional disciplines. The lack of external control becomes a factor of academic dishonesty practices multiplication. The results of the study contribute to the further development of distance learning and online assessment of the quality of students’ mastering the completed disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • N. L. Antonova & S. B. Abramova, 2023. "Distance Education: Online Proctoring as a Tool for Assessing Learning Outcomes," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 27(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2023:id:1643
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2023.02.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1643/1177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2023.02.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2023:id:1643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.