IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acl/journl/y2026id900.html

Institutional Development of the Greater Tumen Initiative: 30 Years On

Author

Listed:
  • M. V. Niyazova

Abstract

The Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) regards as the leading economic cooperation framework in Northeast Asia, having been in operation for thirty years. Its development is under economic globalization, geostrategic shifts, and the subsequent rise of protectionism. This article examines the economic and legal characteristics of integration cooperation in the subregion. It analyzes the forms of decision-making within the association and describes the trade and economic relations between China, Russia, the Republic of Korea, and Mongolia using indicators of trade turnover, the trade intensity index, and the trade complementarity index. As a result, the main stages of the GTI’s institutional development within the international economic system identify: international legal establishment (1995–2004); institutional restructuring (2005–2010); functional integration (2011–2020); digital and environmental transition (since 2021). Having emerged from the classical model of forming a subject of international law, over 30 years the GTI transforms into a «soft law» laboratory in the NEA based on cooperation and institutional interaction. The institutional development of the partnership has an indirect impact on the mutual trade flows of the participating countries, despite the high level of interest they show in one another. The aggregate imports of these countries grew at a faster pace, but trade flows are under geopolitical tensions. The trade intensity index between the participating countries confirms interest in the partnership, but there is potential for growth. The trade complementarity index indicates the relative compatibility of the countries’ trade profiles and illustrates a divergent trend. It concludes that there is a need to increase the intensity and complementarity of trade based on the principle of mutual benefit for all participants.

Suggested Citation

  • M. V. Niyazova, 2026. "Institutional Development of the Greater Tumen Initiative: 30 Years On," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", vol. 12(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2026:id:900
    DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2026-2-5-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/viewFile/900/582
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21686/2410-7395-2026-2-5-26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiyoun Park, 2024. "Multilateral Cooperation in Northeast Asia: Insights from Micro-Regional Cooperation in the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI)," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    2. Yue Wang & Donghe Quan & Weihong Zhu & Zhehao Lin & Ri Jin, 2023. "Habitat Quality Assessment under the Change of Vegetation Coverage in the Tumen River Cross-Border Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Huangen Xie & Da Zhang & Ying Nan, 2025. "Mapping Water Yield Service Flows in the Transnational Area of Tumen River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenming Gao & Qian Song & Haoxiang Zhang & Shiru Wang & Jiarui Du, 2025. "Analysis of Changes in Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in the Sanjiangyuan Region and the Main Driving Factors from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2026:id:900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Золотова Екатерина Владимировна (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rea.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.