IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aca/journl/y2026id689.html

Development of a methodology for assessing the system of cross-border relations

Author

Listed:
  • L. S. Leonteva

  • I. A. Golubtsov

Abstract

The article addresses the lack of a comprehensive methodology for assessing the state of border relations in the Russian Federation. The author emphasizes the strategic significance of border territories in context of national and regional development, highlighting their unique geopolitical and socio-economic position. Based on the analysis of current governmental programs and international practices, a unified methodology for quantitative and qualitative assessment of cross-border interactions is proposed. The study focuses on developing an indicator system that reflects political, economic, social, and environmental aspects, alongside an analytical algorithm for data interpretation. Special attention is given to the adaptability of the methodology to various regional contexts, including Russia’s new territories. The presented approach incorporates mathematical models, statistical data processing, and the index system for ranking regions by their development and resilience. The results can be applied to improve management efficiency, evaluate programmatic funding, and forecast socio-economic impacts of cross-border processes.

Suggested Citation

  • L. S. Leonteva & I. A. Golubtsov, 2026. "Development of a methodology for assessing the system of cross-border relations," RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 4.
    • Handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2026:id:689
    DOI: 10.28995/3033-7216-2025-4-89-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/viewFile/689/495
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.28995/3033-7216-2025-4-89-106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander I. Borodin & Nataliya N. Kiselyova & Nataliya N. Shash, 2011. "Assessment of the Regional Environmental Programs Efficiency," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 49-62, October.
    2. John B. Gilmour, 2007. "Implementing OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-40.
    3. Nataliya N. Shash, 2011. "Program-Based Budget Formation and Evaluation of Budget Program Efficiency," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 55-64, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Drumaux, 2011. "Les anomalies dans les réformes publiques: le pourquoi et le comment?," Working Papers CEB 11-061, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. repec:rnp:wpaper:2861 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. L. A. Tsvetkova, 2016. "Model For Shaping A System Composed Of Measurable Indicators For Defining Priority Areas Using Us National Institutes Of Healthcare As A Role Example," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 2(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2026:id:689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.