Author
Abstract
Requirement Prioritization (RP) and Issue Prioritization (IP) are critical for effective software engineering, dictating optimal resource allocation and deployment sequencing. While conventional frameworks such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and MOSCOW offer structured approaches, they lack the scalability required for modern Agile and DevOps environments. To evaluate the technological trajectory toward automated backlog management, this study conducts a PRISMA-compliant Systematic Literature Review (SLR) analyzing the paradigm shift from foundational Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipelines to Large Language Models (LLMs) and autonomous agentic workflows. Synthesizing data from exactly 78 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025, the review quantifies the evolution of prioritization efficacy. The analysis reveals that while static NLP models achieve robust baseline metrics demonstrating average top-3 accuracy scores of 81% and Mean Squared Errors of 2.2 on massive datasets exceeding 29,000 repository issues, they inherently lack deep contextual inference capabilities. Conversely, recent LLM-augmented and deep learning frameworks demonstrate prioritization accuracies ranging from 73% to 90% while reducing processing times to under 25 seconds. Optimized metaheuristic approaches additionally report up to a 30% performance increase over traditional AHP. However, despite these statistical improvements, enterprise LLM deployments remain constrained by hallucination risks and an inability to adapt to real-time temporal dependencies without human intervention. Addressing this critical gap, the review examines the orchestration of LangChain-based agentic architectures capable of dynamic, self-correcting multi-agent decision logic. The study concludes by presenting an agentic workflow framework validated against historical issue tracking datasets and proposes a consolidated research agenda focusing on algorithmic governance, multi-stakeholder fairness, and real-time dependency graph modeling in next-generation automated requirement engineering.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:8:y:2026:i:3:p:352-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.