IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v8y2026i3p135-149.html

RQAI-SE: Multi-Layered Ethical and Accountable Quantum AI Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Awais, Sabeen Masood*,Farah Haneef,Taimoor Riaz,Muhammad Majid Zaman,Madiha Khanam

    (Dept. SoftwareEngineering,Capital University of Science and Technology,Islamabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

Introduction/Importance of Study: The application of quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) that combines artificial intelligence and quantum computing allows simulation, optimization, and decision-making capabilities never seen before, but introduces ethical and governance issues that are beyond conventional software engineering paradigms.Novelty statement: In this paper, we introduce the Responsible Quantum-AI Software Engineering (RQAI-SE) framework, a systematic integration of quantum-specific mechanisms for ethics, accountability, fairness, and transparency into the QAI software lifecycle.The framework comprises five hierarchically structured engineering layers, addresses four categories of quantum-specific ethical risks (algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, access inequality, andregulatory gaps), and explicitly maps its components to nine governance pillars established by the World Economic Forum (WEF) —structural contributions that distinguish RQAI-SE from existing QSE frameworks that treat ethics as secondary or post-development concerns.Material and Method: The study employs a conceptual design methodology grounded in a systematic review of 40 high-quality sources spanning quantum software engineering, AI ethics, and governance (2021–2025). The framework is validated through comparative analysis with existing QSE frameworks Table 1 and criterion-referenced mapping to the WEF nine governance pillars Table 3.Result and Discussion: The suggested RQAI-SE framework shows how quantum-AI systems can be designed to be both computationally efficientand responsible toward societyusing human-understandable quantum design, the ethical development cycle of the process, and governance models that are multidisciplinary. In contrast to the more performance-focused QSE strategies, the RQAI-SE directly deals with quantum-specific ethical risks, including but not limited to opacity, amplifying bias of probabilistic guarantees, and governance loopholes, and allows creating trustworthy, inclusive, and accountable. The model also offers a guided basis to align the emerging QAI technologies to the long-term societal values,as well as facilitating scalable and sustainable quantum software development.Concluding Remarks: RQAI-SE provides an effective and prospective basis of responsible QAI development, under which innovations in quantum intelligence are always within the ethical, social, and governance requirements. The framework identifies five priority areas for future research,including empirical case study validation and international certification standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Awais, Sabeen Masood*,Farah Haneef,Taimoor Riaz,Muhammad Majid Zaman,Madiha Khanam, 2026. "RQAI-SE: Multi-Layered Ethical and Accountable Quantum AI Engineering," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 8(3), pages 135-149, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:8:y:2026:i:3:p:135-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1823/2681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1823
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:8:y:2026:i:3:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.