IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v7y2025i6p85-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Evaluating Auditing Tools for Unverified Smart Contracts on Ethereum Blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • Nashaib Akbar, Muhammad Saleem Vighio

    (Department of Computer ScienceQuaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Sciences & TechnologyNawabshah, Pakistan)

Abstract

The Ethereum blockchain has transformed decentralized finance (DeFi) and is widely used to issue ERC20 tokens. However, many of these tokens rely on unverified smart contracts, which pose serious security risks. Hackers can take advantage of vulnerabilities in these unverified ERC20 tokens, leading to scams, financial losses, and a decline in user trust. Although several tools are available to audit smart contracts, their effectiveness in analyzing unverified ERC20 tokens remains uncertain. This study examines three auditing tools HoneyBadger, Maian, and Mythril by testing how well they detect security issues in unverified ERC20 tokens. The SmartBugs framework was used to support the auditing process, enabling parallel execution, standardized reports, and bulk auditing of contracts. For a thorough evaluation, two datasets were used: one from 50,581 Ethereum blockchain blocks and another from the DappRadar list of blacklisted ERC20 tokens. These datasets were chosen to provide a broad and realistic view of how the tools perform on both typical and high-risk contracts. The tools were compared based on their ability to detect issues, their execution speed, and their overall effectiveness. The results revealed clear differences in performance: some tools were better at finding vulnerabilities accurately, while others focused more on speed than depth. This study emphasizes the need to improve smart contract auditing methods and highlights the importance of developing more effective security tools to strengthen the Ethereum blockchain.

Suggested Citation

  • Nashaib Akbar, Muhammad Saleem Vighio, 2025. "A Comparative Evaluating Auditing Tools for Unverified Smart Contracts on Ethereum Blockchain," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 7(6), pages 85-96, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:85-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1364/1869
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1364
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:85-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.