IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v7y2025i6p184-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of SaaS and PaaS Cloud-Based E-Learning Platforms in Terms of Cost-Effectiveness and Scalability

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Alam, Manzoor Hussain, Imran Ali Memon, Zulqarnain Channa, Shamshad Lakho

    (Department of Computer Science Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology Nawabshah, Pakistan. Department of Information Technology Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology Nawabshah, Pakistan. Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Shaheed Benazirabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

Educational institutions must evaluate Software as a Service against Platform as a Service for their e-learning cloud deployment because their cost models differ while trade-offs in scalability and customization needs exist. The research examines SaaS and PaaS cloud platforms to help educational institutions select better options through assessments of their value for money and flexibility and user satisfaction measures. A mixed quantitative and qualitative research design involved collecting data from twenty institutions which were equally distributed between SaaS and PaaS subscribers. These results were supplemented by interviews with IT administration personnel. The research used subscription fees and infrastructure costs as quantitative data alongside user capacity and response times under load. At the same time it collected qualitative information about usability alongside customization flexibility and security perceptions of the solutions.Institutions working with restricted budgets should choose SaaS platforms because they provide cost-effective subscription payments at $2,628.41 per year along with light IT maintenance. Scalability proved to be a challenge for SaaS because it worked with an average of 903 concurrent users at slower rates of 1,313.97ms response times under peak usage conditions. The PaaS platforms outperformed in scalability because they supported 4,656 active users and operated at stable response times of 750.69ms althoughthey demanded substantial infrastructure spending ($4,380.72 annually) and specialized technical knowledge. User satisfaction surveys highlighted SaaS’s ease of adoption (75% satisfaction) versus PaaS’s customization advantages (40% extensive customization satisfaction), though both models achieved comparable security satisfaction (70–75%).The study concludes that SaaS is optimal for institutions prioritizing affordability and simplicity, while PaaS suits those requiring long-term scalability and tailored solutions. Recommendations include hybrid cloud models to balance cost-efficiency and flexibility. These insights aim to empower educational stakeholders in aligning cloud adoption strategies with institutional goals and resource constraints

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Alam, Manzoor Hussain, Imran Ali Memon, Zulqarnain Channa, Shamshad Lakho, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of SaaS and PaaS Cloud-Based E-Learning Platforms in Terms of Cost-Effectiveness and Scalability," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 7(6), pages 184-195, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:184-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1293/1925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/1293
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:184-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.